lade...

Richardzach.org

Richardzach.org

an avatar

a logo

Richard Zach

🌐 Visit Richardzach.org 🌐 Richardzach.org besuchen

✍️Write rieview ✍️Rezension schreiben 🏷️Get Badge! 🏷️Abzeichen holen! ⚙️Edit entry ⚙️Eintrag bearbeiten 📰News 📰Neuigkeiten

Webfan Website Badge

Tags:

Rieviews

Bewertungen

not yet rated noch nicht bewertet 0%

Be the first one
and write a rieview
about richardzach.org.
Sein Sie der erste
und schreiben Sie eine Rezension
über richardzach.org.

Richardzach.org News

MUltseq 2.0

https://richardzach.org/2024/07/...

MUltseq is a sequent theorem prover for arbitrary finite-valued logics. It was developed over 20 years ago by Àngel Gil and Gernot Salzer. Version 2.0 was presented today at TACL 2024 in Barcelona. I also updated MUltlog to v1.7, which includes a script to generate sequent calculus rules for use with MUltseq.

3.7.2024 15:17MUltseq 2.0
https://richardzach.org/2024/07/...

Comment on Famous logicians and their inconsistent theories by Randall Holmes

https://richardzach.org/2021/06/...

NF was not first proposed in "Mathematical Logic", it was first posted in the 1937 paper "New foundations for mathematical logic", and that version has never been shown to be inconsistent [that is the version Rosser used, not the corrected version of the system of ML]. In fact, the core of my claimed proof that it is consistent has just been formally verified in Lean...

1.5.2024 14:05Comment on Famous logicians and their inconsistent theories by Randall Holmes
https://richardzach.org/2021/06/...

Comment on W. W. Tait, 1929–2024 by Valeria de Paiva

https://richardzach.org/2024/03/...

Thank you for writing this! I interacted very little with Bill, he was my Invited Speaker for IMLA (Intuitionistic Modal Logic and Applications) 2005 in Chicago, but I enjoyed talking to him very much. He will be missed!

13.4.2024 14:42Comment on W. W. Tait, 1929–2024 by Valeria de Paiva
https://richardzach.org/2024/03/...

Comment on W. W. Tait, 1929–2024 by Bill Tait (1929-2024) | Carnap Blog

https://richardzach.org/2024/03/...

[…] haven’t really said anything about Bill’s work. Richard Zach has a very good obituary (with a great photo) that goes into some detail on Bill’s contributions to logic, but one […]

26.3.2024 21:35Comment on W. W. Tait, 1929–2024 by Bill Tait (1929-2024) | Carnap Blog
https://richardzach.org/2024/03/...

Comment on W. W. Tait, 1929–2024 by William W. Tait (1929–2024) - Daily Nous

https://richardzach.org/2024/03/...

[…] a remembrance, Richard Zach (Calgary) discusses Professor Tait’s […]

25.3.2024 10:00Comment on W. W. Tait, 1929–2024 by William W. Tait (1929–2024) - Daily Nous
https://richardzach.org/2024/03/...

W. W. Tait, 1929–2024

https://richardzach.org/2024/03/...

The eminent proof theorist and philosopher of mathematics William Walker (“Bill”) Tait died March 15, 2024 in Chicago. He was 95. Bill was born on January 22, 1929, in Freeport, NY, and received a BA from Lehigh University in 1952 where he was taught by Adolph Grünbaum. He undertook graduate studies in philosophy (1952–54) and … Continue reading W. W. Tait, 1929–2024

24.3.2024 22:31W. W. Tait, 1929–2024
https://richardzach.org/2024/03/...

Comment on Sheffer stroke before Sheffer: Edward Stamm by Kent Peacock

https://richardzach.org/2023/02/...

Thanks for this; I was glad to get some background on Stamm. It is worth noting that Stamm is also cited in George Spencer Brown's Laws of Form, at the end of Appendix I. Spencer Brown cites Stamm as an example of an author who bowed to the social pressure against seeing the obvious: "Peirce...who discovered, some thirty years ahead of Sheffer, that the logic of propositions could be done with one constant, did not publish this discovery, although its importance must have been evident to him; that Stamm, who himself discovered and published this fact two years before Sheffer, omits, in his paper, to make a simple and obvious substitution which would have put his claim beyond doubt; and that Sheffer..., who ignored Stamm's paper, is currently credited with the major discovery recorded in it."

8.1.2024 00:40Comment on Sheffer stroke before Sheffer: Edward Stamm by Kent Peacock
https://richardzach.org/2023/02/...

Comment on Wff ‘n Proof by William J McGruder

https://richardzach.org/2005/02/...

Not only is this game still available, there are school tournaments for it!

5.12.2023 02:02Comment on Wff ‘n Proof by William J McGruder
https://richardzach.org/2005/02/...

Comment on Skolem’s 1920, 1923 Papers by rzach

https://richardzach.org/2015/01/...

In reply to <a href="https://richardzach.org/2015/01/skolems-1920-1923-papers/#comment-80382">Alfred Sewitsky Bratterud</a>. Fixed!

28.11.2023 16:01Comment on Skolem’s 1920, 1923 Papers by rzach
https://richardzach.org/2015/01/...

Comment on Skolem’s 1920, 1923 Papers by Alfred Sewitsky Bratterud

https://richardzach.org/2015/01/...

The links to Skolems papers are broken. Very keen on finding these!

28.11.2023 05:40Comment on Skolem’s 1920, 1923 Papers by Alfred Sewitsky Bratterud
https://richardzach.org/2015/01/...

Comment on Introduction à la théorie de la démonstration: Élimination des coupures, normalisation et preuves de cohérence by An Introduction to Proof ...

https://richardzach.org/2022/12/...

[…] French translation […]

17.9.2023 02:18Comment on Introduction à la théorie de la démonstration: Élimination des coupures, normalisation et preuves de cohérence by An Introduction to Proof ...
https://richardzach.org/2022/12/...

Comment on Converting LaTeX to HTML: technical notes by Fall 2023 version of forall x: Calgary – Open Logic Project

https://richardzach.org/2023/07/...

[…] Fully accessible HTML version and SCORM packages using BookML (issue 23). This required many changes under the hood; see the blog post on technical details. […]

15.8.2023 17:20Comment on Converting LaTeX to HTML: technical notes by Fall 2023 version of forall x: Calgary – Open Logic Project
https://richardzach.org/2023/07/...

Converting LaTeX to HTML: technical notes

https://richardzach.org/2023/07/...

I just posted on the OLP that forall x: Calgary now has an HTML version for reading online. Here are some technical notes in case that’s helpful for anyone. First, LaTeX to HTML conversion has long been tricky. No solution is perfect. There are basically three workable approaches: I just ran LaTeXML on the forall … Continue reading Converting LaTeX to HTML: technical notes

28.7.2023 02:28Converting LaTeX to HTML: technical notes
https://richardzach.org/2023/07/...

forall x now in HTML for extra accessibility

https://openlogicproject.org/202...

I’m happy to report that forall x: Calgary is now available in an HTML version for reading online. It turned […]

27.7.2023 16:14forall x now in HTML for extra accessibility
https://openlogicproject.org/202...

Sheffer stroke before Sheffer: Edward Stamm

https://richardzach.org/2023/02/...

It came up in discussion at the Formal Turn conference the other day, so I thought I’d preserve an old Twitter thread here: The first person to publish results on NAND and NOR (Sheffer stroke and Peirce arrow) was the Polish mathematician and Philosopher Edward Stamm (1886–1940). The publication was “Beitrag zur Algebra der Logik … Continue reading Sheffer stroke before Sheffer: Edward Stamm

18.2.2023 09:52Sheffer stroke before Sheffer: Edward Stamm
https://richardzach.org/2023/02/...

Introduction à la théorie de la démonstration: Élimination des coupures, normalisation et preuves de cohérence

https://richardzach.org/2022/12/...

Mancosu, Paolo, Sergio Galvan, and Richard Zach. 2022. Introduction à la théorie de la démonstration: Élimination des coupures, normalisation et preuves de cohérence. Paris: Vrin. Traduction française de An Introduction to Proof Theory. Cet ouvrage offre une introduction accessible à la théorie de la démonstration : il donne les détails des preuves et comporte de nombreux … Continue reading Introduction à la théorie de la démonstration: Élimination des coupures, normalisation et preuves de cohérence

15.12.2022 22:39Introduction à la théorie de la démonstration: Élimination des coupures, normalisation et preuves de cohérence
https://richardzach.org/2022/12/...

An epimorphism between Fine and Ferguson’s matrices for Angell’s AC

https://richardzach.org/2022/07/...

Zach, Richard. 2022. “An Epimorphism Between Fine and Ferguson’s Matrices for Angell’s AC.” Logic and Logical Philosophy, Forthcoming, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2022.025. Angell’s logic of analytic containment AC has been shown to be characterized by a 9-valued matrix NC by Ferguson, and by a 16-valued matrix by Fine. It is shown that the former is the image … Continue reading An epimorphism between Fine and Ferguson’s matrices for Angell’s AC

27.7.2022 18:00An epimorphism between Fine and Ferguson’s matrices for Angell’s AC
https://richardzach.org/2022/07/...

Epsilon theorems in intermediate logics

https://richardzach.org/2022/01/...

Baaz, Matthias, and Richard Zach. 2022. Epsilon theorems in intermediate logics. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 87(2), pp. 682–720. DOI: 10.1017/jsl.2021.103. Open access. Any intermediate propositional logic (i.e., a logic including intuitionistic logic and contained in classical logic) can be extended to a calculus with epsilon- and tau-operators and critical formulas. For classical logic, this … Continue reading Epsilon theorems in intermediate logics

10.1.2022 23:18Epsilon theorems in intermediate logics
https://richardzach.org/2022/01/...

The genealogy of ‘∨’

https://richardzach.org/2022/01/...

Elkind, Landon D. C., and Richard Zach. 2022. The Genealogy of ‘∨.’ The Review of Symbolic Logic, 1–38. DOI: 10.1017/S1755020321000587. forthcoming The use of the symbol ∨ for disjunction in formal logic is ubiquitous. Where did it come from? The paper details the evolution of the symbol ∨ in its historical and logical context. Some … Continue reading The genealogy of ‘∨’

3.1.2022 19:00The genealogy of ‘∨’
https://richardzach.org/2022/01/...

Cut-free completeness for modular hypersequent calculi for modal logics K, T, and D

https://richardzach.org/2021/12/...

We investigate a recent proposal for modal hypersequent calculi. The interpretation of relational hypersequents incorporates an accessibility relation along the hypersequent. These systems give the same interpretation of hypersequents as Lellman's linear nested sequents, but were developed independently by Restall for S5 and extended to other normal modal logics by Parisi. The resulting systems obey Došen's principle: the modal rules are the same across different modal logics. Different modal systems only differ in the presence or absence of external structural rules. With the exception of S5, the systems are modular in the sense that different structural rules capture different properties of the accessibility relation. We provide the first direct semantical cut-free completeness proofs for K, T, and D, and show how this method fails in the case of B and S4.

21.12.2021 18:55Cut-free completeness for modular hypersequent calculi for modal logics K, T, and D
https://richardzach.org/2021/12/...
Subscribe

🔝

Datenschutzerklärung    Impressum